Romance Writers of America filed for bankruptcy. For some reason, I’ve received a number of emails about it. Not sure why since we are not members, although we did give a talk one time to the local Austin chapter of RWA.
If you google this topic, you will come across an article from Bloomberg, which hilariously blames Courtney Milan for the collapse of RWA. Poor Courtney and her superpowers. #sarcasm. Full disclaimer: I’ve met Courtney in person, so we do know each other in a professional setting.
There are two sides of this coin: social and financial. Let’s talk about the social one first.
A quick recap of Courtney Milan vs RWA: RWA always had issues with their definition of romance, which was pretty much white and straight. Which is a crying shame because RWA was founded by Vivian Stephens, a legendary editor and a woman of color, who was basically the mother of non-white romance in US. They took their founder’s legacy and stomped all over it. But I digress.
In 2019 Courtney Milan criticized a couple of romance books for their portrayal of Asian women, which Courtney, who is of Chinese descent, found lacking and quite frankly racist. The authors complained to RWA, alleging that because Courtney had a wide social media following, her criticism caused them to lose sales. Publicly RWA always leaned into the toxic side of “we should be nice to each other.” Privately, not so much. More on that later.
Courtney fired back, pointing out that she had a right to call out racism and perpetuation of harmful stereotypes, and that telling her, as a woman of color, to shut up and sit down wasn’t a good look for RWA. Paraphrasing here, obviously. RWA suspended her and banned her from being an officer of the organization for life. They made her permanently ineligible to hold a leadership position. What happened to being nice?
A whole bunch of people had a problem with it, got up and left. You can read a longer version on Vox.
As long as I’ve been in publishing – which is roughly 17 years – RWA felt like a reactionary organization. It seemed like RWA leadership desperately clung to a very narrow definition of romance and fiercely gatekept anyone from changing it.
The social and political climate in the mid 2000’s was very different. When we started out, Black Romance had its own section in the book store. You would walk into Wal-Mart, and there would the usual romance section and then to the side, there would be a small section for “African-American Romance.” They segregated it. Mind boggles, but that’s the way it was. This gives you the idea of the cultural landscape. Interracial couples were controversial. Gay people were controversial. Gay protagonists were unheard of. But forced seduction was okay. The genre has come a long way.
For the majority of my career, watching as an outside observer, it appeared that RWA was on guard against everyone: authors of color, gay people – Suzanne Brockman gave the most amazing speech about it, self-published authors, writers who wrote in genres they didn’t consider as “romance.” You would see PNR people openly snubbed at conferences because they didn’t write white contemporary or historical.
It felt like fear. As if the people who did the most urgent gatekeeping were afraid that if other subgenres flourished and people who are different from the status quo told their stories, they would become popular and take a piece of the publishing pie away from them. And when people pointed that out, the response was to shame and to hurl accusations of not being nice. The organization had multiple opportunities to alter course, but ultimately, it didn’t.
You can’t completely blame Bloomberg for crediting Courtney Milan with for RWA’s failure to thrive. After all, they included it in their bankruptcy filing.
Subsequently, predominantly due to disputes concerning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) issues between some members of a prior RWA board and others in the larger romance writing community, membership decreased to approximately 3,000.
Smart Bitches, Trashy Books – very good rant.
They just had to get that last dig in.
Courtney Milan didn’t ruin RWA. RWA ruined RWA because they failed to evolve. In the last 5 years, membership shrank from 10,000 to only about 2,000 members. If a professional organization doesn’t represent you, doesn’t advocate for your interests, and actively attempts to suppress your voice, why would you continue your membership?
Which brings us to the other side of the coin, the financial decline. Like many professional organizations, RWA depended on membership dues. One of their biggest draws was the RWA conference, which was attended by readers and industry professionals editors, publishers, publicists, agents, etc. If you were just starting out or if you had something to shop, it was a good place to make connections. Writing is solitary and for a lot of us conferences like that were a chance to have lunch with our friends whom we saw once a year.
But conferences are expensive. The one time we tried to run one, we learned that hotels make you commit to a block of rooms in advance. Let’s say you think 100 people are coming and you request 100 rooms. 75 people show up. You are on the hook for those 25 rooms that didn’t get used. You must pay for them.
Due to COVID concerns, the Debtor held its annual conference virtually in 2020 and 2021, and subsequently its membership reduced further. RWA was able to postpone its obligations to the respective Conference Centers these two years by agreeing to add two future years to the applicable Conference Center Contract to 2028.
There we go. First, there was COVID, and when COVID was over, RWA still had a major image problem. Nobody came to the conference. The membership had dropped, the reader attendance withered because the authors they wanted to see were no longer attending, and the publishing professionals moved on, since without readers the conference was no longer a valid promotional opportunity. Down went the dominoes. No big mystery.
Did RWA do a lot of good? Probably. It was started with the best of intentions. Sadly, we’ll mostly remember the collapse. Hopefully, something new will rise from these ashes, because we really do need a writing organization that advocates for our rights and offers support and mentorship.
Mod R is off today, so please be considerate in your comments. I have to write today and I may have to lock the comments section ion self-defense.
Vanessa says
1st?
It’s super silly that RWA was a dinosaur but didn’t know it.
Ilona says
First. And it’s not that they didn’t know it. Many people tried to change it. It just had a lot of inertia.
Ash says
“You either die a hero or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.”
Sabrina says
Oooo, nice quote – is it attributed to anyone in particular? (I could probably google it, but I’m lazy today 🙈)
Tina says
it’s a Batman quote I think.
Brent says
The exact quote is from Harvey Dent (2008 Batman).
But, the sentiment comes from Joseph Campbell–monomyth, The Hero with 1000 Faces, heroic cycle (and is likely older than him, since he was studying mythology and legends).
Michelle says
I think this was a paraphrase from something Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington said about himself. Hero of Waterloo – yay! Mayor of London, closed the water gate under the tower – boo! Became the Prime Minister of a faltering economy – near universally hated by the time of his death.
Patricia says
This reminds me of the Bujold quote ““…the trouble with oaths of the form, death before dishonor, is that eventually, given enough time and abrasion, they separate the world into two sorts of people: the dead, and the forsworn.”
― Lois McMaster Bujold, A Civil Campaign. RWA chose Death.
Kelticat says
loved that scene, along with the reset button.
isi says
I think they chose forsworn first, then they noticed the missing reset button…
And to complete the quote, “It’s a survivor’s problem, this one…” 😉
Debbie B says
People give ‘fear’ more power than it warrants in many cases. It appears that RWA had some members stuck in a staid mode, that wouldn’t accept that humanity had moved on from ridged ethnic dictates(who doesn’t sigh over ‘class overstepping’?)over all. There shouldn’t be any horror, clutching of pearls, when differing skin toned people love each other. In ‘The Lathe Of Heaven’, when everyone was The Same GRAY, Interesting individuals, made so by their circumstances of heritage, were LOST, there was Less Savor to humanity, so to speak. The need for Richness & Variety, is a human trait, and that organization wasn’t going to be supported by the few who couldn’t Move On, wouldn’t accept Any multiplicity from ‘the few’s’ ideals. My mom, step-dad, maternal grandparents, had no issues with me marrying a half-Japanese man almost 30 years ago, and my grandfather fought in WW2. RWA had some members stuck in ‘Fear Of Different’ and in lashing out, doomed their association.
mad_troll says
OMG! I loved The Lathe Of Heaven (although not being US-ian the heavy weight of colour vs everything else felt weird).
More on topic, I feel that Different Culture is one of the best ways to still make use of the “miscommunication”Romance cliché without falling into the Bad Communication/Abusive trap: you can have both protagonists being well-adjusted and nice!
Jenn says
Was this the same organization that recently held a conference that was terrible and upset everyone? Either way they don’t seem willing at all to accept responsibility for their demise.
Ilona says
No, that was an unrelated venture. 🙂
Amy Ann says
I worked in the industry during their heyday and had frequent contact with them. I no longer am in the industry (still miss it sometimes, but I get a fix from you guys) and can only say as has been demonstrated over and over–Evolve. Or decline and die. A hard truth and it’s a hard thing to do at times.
Ilona says
I miss the industry sometimes and I am in it, heh.
Logan says
Courtney Milan is the best historical fantasy writer out there IMO, so I support her taking down the RWA!
Mog says
Yeah, I love her books. Also how she’s so open about the gap between history as it was and history how it should have been, and writing in the gaps.
Mog says
Hopefully this is dying out, but I hate how publishers and the conservative leadership were so snobbish about the readers. So many variations on, “well I would be fine with a gay sheriff character but you know romance readers, so backwards and insular. Comes from staying at home with the cats all the time”
Ilona says
As anecdotal evidence, we were never asked to adjust our characters. The only time something like that ever came up was with the wererats in KD. They were married a few years before gay marriage became legal, and every editorial pass of that book someone carefully checked if two male names were a typo. We were never asked to change it, however, and on the next book, they stopped checking.
Wendy says
I love that you had marriages and relationships of all types in your books. makes it feel more real. tyvm!
Ilona says
Oh we screwed up quite a bit with all sorts of things. Sometimes when I read the earlier books, it’s like watching toddlers stumble in the dark. Hopefully we will do better in the future.
Marsha Scott says
FWIW, I have appreciated the move away from the white default, where only people of colour have their race described. Thank you.
Margaret K says
I noticed this too and appreciated it.
Margaret K says
But this is why I love you all. I can see your books develop and move and grow as you learn too. Keep at it. 💜
Maria Schneider says
I think that is true of any author. We evolve and learn as we write.
Nifty says
There’s always drama in Romancelandia. People — readers, authors, agents — love to get sucked in. It’s one of the main reasons I stopped visiting blogs and other romance-centered websites.
I could be way wrong but I think another of the main issues with RWA in the later years was flat-out snobbery: it seemed to me that the “traditionally published” set had real disdain for the indie/self-published authors.
Amy Ann says
As did I until I found Ilona Andrews who rocked my world and caused me to change my views on self-publishing. I have since found other self-published authors, both good and bad, so I thank you.
Brooke says
I used to work for the little company that recorded RWA sessions every year (starting with selling cassettes!) during the 90s- early 2000s. I loved going and meeting so many authors I admired and bringing home hundreds of books. I have such good memories of the conference…and I’m so disappointed in how far they’ve fallen in terms of leadership and inclusiveness. It’s a shame.
Sarah says
It is sad to know that calling out racism gets you banned from groups. For every person that stands up against an injustice, there are a hundred that hesitate because the don’t want to face the backlash. I have only read a few Courtney Milan books, but will now actively seek her books out. Courage is standing up for what is right, even when everyone is saying you ate wrong.
sarah says
are, not ate….
sarafina says
+ infinity
Bill G says
Fascinating.
Laura Martinez says
Excellent analysis.
Kathy A says
I’m so glad you mentioned Suzanne Brockman. I was going to comment about her withdrawal from RWA, but you included it. Outstanding speech. Thank you for your input as well.
Stacey says
Hmm. straight up romance isn’t my thing most of the time but I do love people who push back so I might have to look up Courtney Milan.
My high single digits child has more emotional maturity than RWA.
Revanche says
She’s pretty delightful on Bluesky (and before that, Twitter): intelligent, thoughtful, makes complex issues more clear. Her books are excellent.
Christine says
Her newsletter is excellent, also. I’m not a big historical romance reader, but I look forward to her musings on tea and society every week.
Rose says
Ha! I have that with a couple authors too. enjoy their social media presence more than their actual books.
Courtney isn’t one though but i agree she’s great on tea and dog vidoes. My favorite of hers is one of her more recent ones: The Duke who Didn’t.
Whitney says
Thank you very much for this forthright post, I found it very validating and affirming!
Patricia Schlorke says
Interesting. No wonder why I turned away from a lot of romance books years ago. When I would pick up a book in the bookstore and read the back, I could tell I would get bored with it right away and put it back.
This is when I started branching out in my reading and decided to take a chance on two authors called Ilona Andrews and other authors. 🙂
Kim Stewart says
They way they have vilified CM without looking at *why* they’re were vilifying, and the attitudes that vilification cemented was all the worst aspects of conservatism in a nutshell. Not trying to start a brouhaha- I’m old enough to remember when conservative politicians brought balance to the table. But this reactionary stuff is just the worst. People are people and love is love, and consenting adults can have any kind of romance they want.
And forced seduction gave the Ickes way back in the 70’s and it’s still gross now.
June says
The thing is forced seduction is still around, just fleshed out better to seem less rapey or just branched into separate categories instead of being the the default. The weird thing is if you look even 20 to 30 years before whatever standards rwa is so set on, I bet you romance was likely more backwards then what they set their standards are today. It is small minded to not be able to imagine a way forward but it seems like some people really cannot understand intersectionality. (tangent but if you ever want a simple explanation on intersectionality for others, akilah obviously over on youtube has a great video introducing it using pizza.
Another tangent, I quite like contrapoints over on YouTube’s recent video on romance about the reason why forced seduction is an attractive trope in romance using the twilight series as an example.
My understanding of their interpretation is that it is sometimes due to how repressed women are historically so to make sexual exploration more allowed they went into that trope. There is more to that but that feels like one likely reason rwa may not want to get with the times.
Contrapoints video also bring up old school debates in romance that relates to my note about how romance likely had to evolve to get to the point rwa was stuck on today which makes it hypocritical that they are unwilling to acknowledge changes that need to keep being made for themselves to progress.)
Ilona says
There is a number of reasons why forced seduction in fiction persists. Some reasons that I have seen discussed but do not necessarily agree with:
Since premarital sex is discouraged in US (puritanism), especially for women, the idea of forced seduction removes the blame from the woman, allowing her to enjoy having sex; forced seduction is the ultimate evidence of male desire, and women want to be wanted; forced seduction touches on a specific sexual kink, etc.
It doesn’t actually matter too much why forced seduction is there. It is okay to enjoy it in fiction, provided it is clearly labeled, and it is okay to roleplay it among consenting adults. Fantasy exists for this exact reason – to allow us to play out scenarios that we would not want to touch with a ten foot pole in real life.
The problem occurs when the line between fiction and reality is blurred, and people start thinking that consent is unnecessary.
Susan says
I am a fan of Courtney Milan and remember the discourse. RWA pledged to change its course and open things up but it seemed to become more narrow.
In the world today, it is not possible to stay so close-minded and flourish.
Kelli McBride says
I was a member of RWA for several years mainly because of the local group of authors. I learned a lot about writing because my chapter had a large group of generous published authors. However, the toxicity of whether epub authors were real published authors was ridiculous. I eventually left because I no longer felt I was benefitting from the meetings. This is sad.
Marica says
That reminds me to check out and buy any books by Courtney Milan that I don’t already own.
Sabrina says
“The genre has come a long way.” Yes, it really, really has, as I’m always very happy to tell interns who look at Romance and, well, any commercial publishing lists askance – and that means, almost every single intern we get. Honestly, if I weren’t so swamped with Life, I’d seriously consider writing a PhD thesis on the topic!
But my shorthand explanation has by now been polished to: Literature pushes the boundaries, and commercial fiction is what happens when all that free space gets coloured in.
Anyone that looks down on Romance looks down on what I do and is therefore unworthy of my time.
(note: very much my personal opinion, ymmv, it’s been One Of Those Weeks so if this comes on a bit strong, please take it with a hefty dose of salt. Will now revert to my usual much more fluffy self.)
Elizabeth KW says
It’s taken me years to be up front at work and with casual friends about reading romance. Mysteries were fine. Science fiction, back in my youth? I didn’t know any other girls who read it.
But don’t even mention romance if you wanted to be taken seriously.
Of my four brothers, one now reads romance himself – but the oldest one still thinks anything with sex in must be trash. And he’s a professor of ancient Greek history: think of all those myths involving Zeus and his latest fling (aka rape or seduction without clear consent).
I’ll stand by my romances and HEA.
Sharon Shriner says
Suzanne Brockmann’s speech rocked!
Bev says
Yes it did! I must reread her books. I have them in the original paperback format!
Kelly R says
Thanks for this background, and particular thanks for sharing the Suzanne Brockman speech. Made me glad for all that money I spent on her books when she was one of the first authors I found when I started reading romance again after decades of reading fantasy and science fiction almost exclusively.
Megha says
I just came here to appeal to everyone to Not disturb IA when they’re in writing mode!!
I love the (hilarious and tragic) insight into the rise and epic (justified) fall of the RWA. But the minute Ilona said she was writing today I just wanted to make her many cups of perfectly brewed tea and Gordon his beverage of choice as they write stories for us!!!!!!!!!
Jana Oliver says
RWA always seemed to be slow to adapt. I ran into that as an indie author back in 2002 and they just didn’t know what to do with us folks. It took forever for them to realize there was more than one way to publish books.
But the flack I took **was nothing** compared to what authors of color and LGBTQ authors were getting. It was ridiculous.
As you say, hopefully a new organization arises, one that realizes that Romance is vibrant, and diverse.
Amanda says
For anyone who likes listening to podcasts, Smart Bitches Trashy Books’ podcast did a 4 episode series on this topic a few years ago. One episode is an interview with Courtney Milan, who is an intelligent delight:
https://smartbitchestrashybooks.com/podcast/391-rwa-one-month-later-part-iv-a-conversation-with-courtney-milan/
Linzi says
+1 This was the first I’d heard about it (back then) and they did a brilliant job.
Leslie says
Wow, great write-up. Thank you for the history lesson and analysis. I think the message to be taken away from this is learn to evolve and change with the times, or die an ignominious death. I wish more of this country would be accepting of that.
Sam says
+1 to all
Relin says
Thank you for kindly providing a different perspective for this. It’s fascinating to see how many chances they had to course correct.
Leah C says
I followed the dispute on social media a few years ago. Even when given a chance to say or do the right thing, RWA showed itself to be deficient of sound inclusive leadership. I’m surprised it took this long to be financially deficient.
Lacey Pfeffer says
Thank you for the insight. I don’t read “traditional” romance, so I had no idea what was going on
Bennett says
Well said. Thank you!
Donna A says
I remember hearing about the Courtney Milan controversy. And then there have been the problems with the Hugo’s too.
It’s ridiculously ironic that literary groups should become so staid and insular that they self destruct when fiction is meant to be about freedom and pushing boundaries.
Especially in romance and SF&F! If ever you would expect a nice open minded group of people it would be in these two genres.
RT Boyce says
Holy smokes, that speech by Suzanne Brockman is amazing!
I hope a better organization replaces the local groups and the convention that provided so much networking and community.
Dawn Emerson says
Sounds to me like a combination of Professional Tone-deafness and blaming the victim for their own behavior.
It’s a shame, but if the organization was so unable/unwilling to evolve to meet the needs and desires of both authors and readership, not to mention altering course to meet current societal norms, then the failed both the authors who paid for membership as well as the readers eager to meet those authors in whatever venue could be organized.
That said, let’s hope that a viable phoenix rises from the ashes of the utter failure of the organization.
Andrew says
The bankruptcy filing is to get out from under the Marriott hotel contract which runs until 2028. RWA itself isn’t planning on changing in any meaningful way, unfortunately.
njb says
Whoa, that was an interesting article from Vox. Since it’s been over three years from the massive meltdown, apparently the organization learned zip and was thus unable to mend any fences. I fail to feel sorry, tho I guess there’s as yet no viable replacement. What a mess.
jewelwing says
Thank you; those were some fascinating rabbit holes.
The fragility is kind of stupefying. These people who say they’re not racist, or they don’t see color, but they’re afraid white people are being erased – if either of the first two were true, the last bit would not be. If you really see every human as human, then no one is being erased or replaced. But then no one automatically gets to skip to the head of the line either. Bless their hearts! May they find the grace to get over themselves.
Bev says
Hallelujah!
Sons says
I’m stealing those last two sentences! (After I clean up the tea I was drinking when you made me laugh!)
mary says
Thank you!! As someone who has friends and family that are gay and trans, of a color different from what is considered white, you’re calm and reasoned words of what happened with RWA were good to read.
I have enjoyed many Romance/SciFi/Fantasy books and books of all kinds that feature people of all kinds, so Thank you!
Hope the Beloved Authors have a great weekend with great weather and No Cicadas.
mary says
Just watched Suzanne Brockman at the RWA Rita 2018. She kicked ASS. Thank you Suzanne!
PamG says
Thanks for this very interesting and balanced take on the RWA situation. At the time it was happening, I followed it with extreme fascination, just as I followed the SFWA brouhaha. I’m just a reader, so my pov is somewhat distanced. I got the impression at the time that a lot of the resistance to change came from organization staff–people who basically were the underpinnings of the group, while the members and other stake holders were less entrenched over time. It seemed hard for some members, board members, officers, and such to take necessary radical action without risking the good that RWA did. Apparently, certain attitudes and blind spots became hard-baked into the organizational culture, until those who did disagree with the narrow conservativism really didn’t have a choice but to leave. The controversy around Courtney Milan didn’t cause RWA’s issues, it made them impossible to ignore. The longer it went on the more obvious the racism and homophobia became, and I have tremendous respect for those who left early. Sometimes, you have no choice but to let your feet do the talking.
Reading the Smart Bitches, Trashy Books post on the bankruptcy initially gave me a shudder of sneaky schadenfreude, but bankruptcy isn’t “The End.”. Romance writers, readers, publishers and publishing adjacent trades still need an agora to fill the gap that RWA left and, frankly, prevent the old school RWA from growing and reclaiming the space.
SoCoMom says
I know pretty much nothing about this industry but appreciate the summing up. I appreciate that you are balanced in your assessments.
LynneW says
As Jana Oliver said, this has been going on for a long time. RWA’s website doesn’t mention the bankruptcy filing, and I’m sure they will expect to carry on as usual despite everything.
I remember the 2002 “self-published authors are not real authors” issue and the 2005 effort to redefine romance as only between one man and one woman, plus the 2005 RITA event that was offensive to many. More here for those interested: https://allaboutromance.com/2005-rwa-conference-reporting-about-the-rita-presentation/
It’s sad when a professional organization attacks its own members for pointing out its deficiencies.
Anna L says
I follow courtney milan, she has an amazing tea newsletter. I also volunteer at a very large used booksale and it has been an uphill battle to convince the romance sorter that lgbtq+ romance belong there and not in the sex category. Sadly its still a work in progress. Romance has become my comfort read during the pandemic so Im happy to see that its evolving. Also Ilona books are on my comfort re reading list as well so thank you for your writing, it really brings me a lot of joy
Shiloh Walker says
I left RWA not long after the debacle with Damon Suede.
I stayed longer than I should, pushing for change because authors of color were still fighting.
But too many didn’t want to change & I couldn’t keep giving them my money.
CharisN says
Thank you. I couldn’t remember the name of the guy who was a major player in the RWA debacle (of 2019 anyway)
Christine says
God, that guy! How had I forgotten about that?
Meg says
The only reason to be against DEI is fear that you will become irrelevant if you aren’t controlling what is “normal” in your environment. My company does a ton of DEI committees and events. While there is a lot of corporate koolaid mixed into it, it is pretty cool to take 10 minutes of your day and listen to someone whose life experience is very different than your own. Ultimately the minimal effort to become better humans at work is worth it, I think.
Too bad RWA chose going down in flames instead.
sarafina says
I read about this yesterday or the day before. Considering how much more interesting and fun PNR and UF are, RWA was very narrow-minded about the future. Kind of like trains about cars. Although I think Courtney Milan was treated poorly.
Susan J says
Thanks for the backstory. Here I go, off to Amazon to buy a Courtney Milan book.
Carrie B says
Other authors’ associations are Novelists, Inc (for all genres) and for sci-fi, SFWA – although that one comes with a long history of drama as well.
Mary says
You have written an excellent piece regarding this topic. Thank you. I agree with you.
njb says
Seriously enjoyed Suzanne Brockman’s speech. Have never read anything of hers, but will have to check them out now.
AP says
I had no idea about any of this so thank you for educating me.
Not only am I entertained by your blog but I also learn so much about so many different topics.
Lidy says
I love that, in their last attempt to throw shade at Courtney Milan, the RWA proved that they were the white supremacist, homophobic and prejudiced organization CM denounced them as. I really hope it gives her grounds to sue them to oblivion, and in the nearby future, CM is one of the leaders in a new rise of a reliable professional org for romance writers.
I also find it strange that they didn’t include Suzanne Brockmann, Sarah MacLean, Tessa Dare, Nora Roberts, and others under that shade, because they all had a lot to add. Oh, and the person who thought it’d be a good idea to give an award to a book featuring a Nazi officer-Jewish woman pairing.
(Yes, someone did that)
But sure, let’s blame Courtney Milan. /s
I don’t know CM, but I wish her all the best.
Raye says
Courtney Milan is a gorgeous writer. I love her work, and I learn so much. The Devil Comes Courting just dazzled me.
Ami says
Thank you for educating me. I always appreciate your insight and the way you condense the information while providing links to the background details.
I hope a new, inclusive organization can be formed. Sounds like a need.
Heather says
Unexpecter consequences.
Read this post and the SBTB rant linked above (It is an excellent rant). All the magical powers attributed to Courtney Milan by RWA made me curious about her, so I Googled her and now I will be buying one of her books (at least one).
Margaret K says
She is a master of the novella! She manages to make such an emotional impact in a short space, which is hard to do well. I recommend her entire Brothers Sinister series! Impeccably researched and well written. I thoroughly enjoyed it!
CharisN says
I had a funny experience with this topic in September/October 2019. I started picking up vibes concerning a mystery disease possibly originating in China right at the same time that I started following a battle royale going on at RWA. It was so strange to watch two entirely disparate events take off and start growing towards an explosion.
Stefanie says
I have a completely unrelated question: is there any chance that “Grace of Small Magics” will get a sequel? I love Grace and Nassar and the games were just the first volley in the war with Roar, I would really like to know, how Grace will adept to her new life in a new world.
R Coots says
I’d kind of forgotten about them (helps I don’t write romance) except in a “The only local-ish writing group near me is RWA affiliated, poor me” sort of way. I am not at all surprised though, given the various things that went on.
CJ Smith says
Thank for a writer’s viewpoint. I enjoy reading your books. We need more books representing everyone.
Quasimodo says
Fear and Loathing
I think is engendered as much by fear as not. No reasonable person is going to force you (should not) to participate in their lifestyle. Ok rapists of mind and body abound, but it is illegal.
I was recently in the French Quarter of NOLA and was struck by the diversity and inter. Inter you name it. And everyone seemed happy in their preferences and otherness.
A long time ago I read a line about “leaving to others their otherness”. It stuck. Seems like a good rule to live by.
OTH there’s enough self righteous prigs out there to make this a challenge. I’m considering it my lifetime growth opportunity!
Jennifer says
As an HR ( Human Resources) professional I am gobsmacked about the things people and organizations cling too in their refusal to move forward
Marilyn says
I don’t read books that are strictly Romance; to me they are really boring. I lean more toward action romance or comedy romance when I do read “romance” (& yes, I do not like graphic romance”. However, this is my thought. Writers write; readers read. Not all readers read the same thing; no two people are alike. Things I might like, someone else doesn’t. I read books by all authors, regardless of race, color, religion, etc, etc. If I read an excerpt of a book and it doesn’t grab me, I don’t buy it/borrow it. It takes ALL kinds of writers in order to reach EVERYONE. For an organization that is supposed to promote Romance writers to be so biased is, of course, going to cause itself to fail.
Libby says
Well put.
Derek says
My wife and I were RWA members a bit over a decade ago writing strictly romance then. We were both active in our respective local chapters though neither of us went to the big con. Lots of infighting and posturing even back then that seemed rather unnecessary. I did win a couple of RWA chapter contests, got my books in front of editors/publishers, and learned a lot through the gatherings. I guess I view it as a mixed bag with a self imposed bad ending. We were well out when the Courtney Milan thing hit, but I remember the anger over it.
Melissa says
I remember Courtney Milan from the Dear Author/Ellora’s Cave lawsuit days. You’d think the RWA would have remembered that messy saga.
Renee says
Nora Robert’s has a blog post on this when it all went down with Ms. Milan. Even she was no longer a member at that point.
Libby says
I’m sorry to hear that they filed for bankruptcy. It sounds like they brought it upon themselves. Courtney appears blameless. That’s the problem with cancel culture, you will eventually cancel yourself and in your arrogance will be left wondering what happened and unable to take blame or responsibility, will look for a scapegoat. Cue Courtney. It’s sad.
Chris V says
No, not toddlers stumbling in the dark. If you’re self promoting, you need better catch phrases. Like “cutting edge of new trends” or “the start of a new genre”.
We see you.
Christine says
My first thought was, “Couldn’t happen to a nicer organization.”
I have to acknowledge, though, that I met a lot of very good friends through RWA, and boy did being affiliated and serving on my local chapter’s board provide an *education* in institutional and industrial inertia.
I don’t think we’re going to see anything like RWA replace RWA. Our local chapter disaffiliated and went virtual in 2020 and it’s doing ok, but it’s not thriving. I would guess that’s the case for most of the groups that disaffiliated.
In the meantime, a number of profit-based businesses have stepped into the gap to provide author education and networking opportunities. Many of them are offering genuinely good workshops and coaching. They’re nimble and responsive to industry and technological changes in a way RWA (or, to be fair, most large nonprofits largely run by volunteers) can’t be. The people who have the time, energy, inclination, and financial ease necessary to be able to devote themselves to volunteering for a group like RWA tend to skew older and more conservative. (Or are young and desperate to win the approval of the old guard.) These for-profit endeavors are not going to provide much in the way of advocacy, but then RWA’s supposed advocacy ultimately supported the white, straight status quo time and again.
Anyway, any regrets I have watching RWA’s death spiral are for what a lot of good people hoped it could be—not for what it actually is/was (basically, a dumpster fire that kind of looked cozy from far enough away and smelled ok if you were upwind).
Dee Cheetham says
Thank you for laying this out. It’s not an unfamiliar story.
Cathryn Cade says
The heart-breaking piece of RWA’s demise is that when it was good, it was very very good.
I joined in 2006, and in the warm, collegial atmosphere of a thriving local chapter, RCRW Portland OR, learned how to write and publish a romance.
In those days, you couldn’t just ‘Google it’ for all kinds of info and instructions and Who’s Who, the way we can now. RWA held classes, workshops, matched us with crit partners that all helped us learn about our craft AND how to get published.
Without RWA, I likely would not be an indie author with a string of successful books & novellas.
Tragically, the national board did bring about the demise of the org–through bullheadedness and a studied lack of concern for their changing membership.
Dawn Campbell says
“But forced seduction was okay.”
This is one of the reasons I drifted away from reading romance, which was my primary genre while in my 20s; I started coming across it more and more. The final blow was a western where the ‘hero’ was sent to retrieve a woman (not a teenager) and wound up making her walk barefoot across the desert in just her petticoats. As she became increasingly sunburned and miserable, she was falling in love with him. At that point I wound up ripping the book in half and throwing the pieces across the room.
I was already drifting towards scifi, fantasy and urban fantasy anyway and that was just the final death knell.
VeleenFire says
When I was younger I found romance terrible – bad writing, bad ideas, unrealistic, shallow. And I dismissed it completely. Over time I have found that things are not that simple. There is so, so much supply and demand for romance that it’s impossible for all of it to be good and I think as a consequence most romance readers have become accustomed to low quality writing (and yes, there are also some pretty terrible archetypes that need to go away). For a while I thought that if you mix romance with another genre (I usually went for SciFi or Fantasy) that forced the quality up and that was the only way to find good romance, at least a smaller pool to comb though. But eventually I found books that are pure romance that were actually good, it’s is just that they are hard to find since the market is flooded with so much material and I have found reviews in the genre are not a useful way to determine quality at all, so one has to wade through a lot of romance books to find one that is actually worth reading. So I no longer dismiss the genre, but I still find it easier to start with another genre and have romance be secondary as it gives me a higher probability to find a good book.
Genie says
Blaming one author for their bigotry, gatekeeping and bias is absurd. They did it to themselves with their unwillingness to change and be supportive of all who write romance.
Cynthia Fowles says
Maybe this isn’t a bad thing. Maybe a better version will develop. But I suspect it will take time.
Romance novels back in the day were either bodice rippers or Harlequin novels where sex was obliquely referred to in the last few pages. So much has changed in 50 years.
Brandy Williams says
This is informative and clear. Thank you for advocating for communities of color. I love the diversity of your characters too. You rock!
Shai says
I vividly recall a fellow soldier and I finding a stash of Black romance in a locker. She was very critical, mentioning that there was almost nothing culturally appropriate. It was just the authors saying the characters were Black in a typically white romance. That may actually have been the first wedge in my anti-racism journey. Robinson, if you’re out there, thank you.
Oraleen Walls says
As a young teenager my older sisters got me hooked on historical romance books. But I also loved science fiction and fantasy. I never could understand why I couldn’t find a good book with both. Always thought maybe I was just weird to want that. Needless to say I’m a happy camper in my older years. So much to choose from. 😁
Maria Schneider says
I looked into RWA several times when I was looking for an agent (because of the rep of their conferences). Even then, I didn’t find it welcoming. I mean, sure, pay dues, pay a huge fee and attend. Good luck, we might talk to you. It was one of the most expensive conferences going. I think Clarion was more expensive, but at least it was a writing workshop. It too was way outside my budget. Anyway, I later self-published. And I tend to write Hispanic characters, Native American characters and PNR. I suppose technically, some are inter-racial character couples because I mix in the Hispanic, White, Native American characters with abandon. I’m just writing what I know. After self-publishing a few novels, I looked into RWA again…well, as a self-published author, there was no way I felt welcome. They didn’t have panels for me. And their reputation was starting to tarnish by then, here and there on the internet. I had no idea their membership had fallen so low, but if you leave out self published authors these days, that’s more than half of what is being published! I don’t know. Gatekeeping only works for the people behind the gate. Those on the other side just keep doing the best we can. I don’t think anyone really saw the self-publishing boom coming. And no one could really guess how big it would get. As for the racism, it’s inexcusable. I really appreciated your article on the topic and the sharing of the background. I’ve been reading a lot of Black music history lately and I’m simply astounded. Then I read articles where it isn’t historical. And I’m still astounded and greatly saddened. It truly is mind boggling. Thank you again for the post.
Steve L says
Sounds like good riddance. I agree evolve or die, but that is easily done my allowing younger people to replace old at the top over time I would have thought.
Anyway very interesting thanks
Migs Mortz says
Thank you.
Catlover says
I had pretty much forgotten about RWA. I remember reading Nora Roberts’ very succinct article on her website. Change comes hard to people entrenched in “how things are done” and who knows how much came from standard publishing sources worried about their jobs and bottom line. Fortunately I’m a reader and not a writer but I’m always looking for my next new writer and happy when I find one!
Ann says
I just went on Amazon and bought the highest rated Courtney Milan book. I hope her writing career is extremely successful. She deserves it after having to deal with all of this RWA BS.
Cindy Montalbano says
Bravo on your wonderful analysis of what’s happening with rwa. It’s an absolute astonishing wonder that rwa made it this far without collapsing sooner. I hope that authors and publishers come together to develop and create a new organization to replace it that represents everyone.
Jacquie says
It’s too bad that they were so narrow in their thinking. I’m almost 80 and appreciate the way authors now often. don’t say Asian, African Latino, etc, but describe people as having warm skin tones, or dark espresso, etc. letting us see ethnicities as people first. And Disney princesses not always the blond stereotypes now. Moana, you rule girl!
Layla says
I had not seen that speech by Suzanne Brockman. But I lived the journey of the books in which Robyn and Jules finally get their HEA. I was so upset the industry wouldn’t allow for them to have their own book when they first walked on the scene. And when they did finally get their book it felt like such a victory. Knowing the backstory of how they diminished that win feels like the RWA is reaping what they’ve sown.
We have a similar issue with a group in a community I am a part of here. It is for the empowerment of women. The national organization recognizes non-cisgender women, but the chapter here in DFW refuses to. And they are starting to reap consequences.
The Right not Nice thing has been a struggle my whole life. I am very outspoken and come down on the side of right. And when I moved to TX three years ago I felt it even more. Nice is prized entirely too much over right in this state. And it’s a mask to hide the ugly.
Rose says
The sweetest (from a schadenfreude perspective) thing is that this is exactly what Courtney predicted from a legal POV years ago. She clerked with a supreme court judge. She understands fiduciary duty pretty well. Controversies she tried to address as an officer or issues she was pointing out after she was no longer an officer weren’t just hey racism is bad but a failure to address these is a legal failure of fiduciary duty which could lead to insolvency. Cuz giving awards to nazi romance isn’t the best look for making a wide subset of readers feel welcome.
They were dead in the water when they decided to censor Courtney as revenge.
Liz says
As a predominantly romance reader who looks for believable characters and a compelling story, coming across your books was a wonderful discovery. Thank you for posting this. As a non US person I was always curious what RWA was.
VeleenFire says
I didn’t know anything about RWA and reading this article and following all the links (couple of levels down) has been educational. Thank you!
Other genres have had to deal with similar problems. I usually read SciFi and Fantasy so I am more versed in that space. There was an attempt to subvert the main award in that space, the Hugos, some years back (around 2016, I believe) by a group called the Sad Puppies. And while that attempt was unsuccessful, the last Hugos did actually fail with its own spectacular scandal (you can read more about it online if interested: John Scalzi’s blog is a good starting point as well as Daniel Greens’ YouTube channel).
I think more and more organizations and awards, not just professional writing ones, have to come face to face with the fact that people with diverse backgrounds are not going anywhere. They have always been here, but the internet and social media, despite its drawbacks, have made it much harder to silence people. And the newer generations have grown up in a world where much more then before diversity is normal and default.
Sunshine 🌞 says
Hi. So, I have a question? Where is Derek during the Wilmington stories? Has he already set out for Alaska or is he still in Atlanta? If he has already left, then why isn’t he checking in with Curren? I thought Derek was like the honorary brother of Curren? Like Curren was his adopted family?
Also, do you think Gavin, Mad Rogan’s cousin, will make an appearance in Arabella’s story? Also, will you be able to share anything from that universe in the near future? I would love to be at Penelope and Hearts’ wedding, or date night…🤞
Moderator R says
Derek is in Alaska during the Wilmington Years. He left 2 years after Magic Triumphs (2 years after Julie left, in other words) and won’t return until Blood Heir- which happens approximately 2 years *after* the Wilmington Years adventures. We don’t know he doesn’t keep in touch at all with Curran, but Curran and Kate trust him. He needed to leave Atlanta, he talked to them about it, and they understood. There was always support and understanding on both sides of that relationship. For more on it, you can watch or read the Q&A after the release of Magic Clams 🙂 https://ilona-andrews.com/blog/magic-claims-spoiler-party-and-transcript/
For your second question, the Hidden Legacy series is finalised. Future stories, including Arabella’s, may be released in the future, but they are not guaranteed. House Andrews are happy about how they ended that adventure. You can always check the status of a series on the Release Schedule page https://ilona-andrews.com/release-schedule/
Sunshine 🌞 says
Hi Mod R! Thank you for the reply! I will patiently wait for more on Derek in Julie’s book 2. 😁
As for your comment on Hidden Legacy series, I will do the same thing as Her Grace with my fingers in my ears and say “I’m not listening, I’m not listening. This series is not over till we have an Arabella story. La la la la”
Bill from NJ says
I suspect RWA is going to be around, the bankruptcy is likely chapter 11 which will let them get out from debt and reorganize. To be honest the RWA should change its name to HOA, bc that is what they acted like. They are supposed to advocate for the genre, dispel the notion it is written for old ladies with cats, help it flourish…and instead, they came off as out of touch and made REA seem to be run by old ladies with cats. They seemed to be more concerned ‘About the rules’ then the health of the organization.
When the crap hit the fan a well known, older member of the RWA made the comment ‘they are pushing things too hard, too fast’ , talking about those upset at the RWAs actions. I like this author but wow, in the third decade of the 21st century to be saying that is mind boggling,that is what opponents of the civil rights acts in the 1960s said about dismantling Jim Crow.
That they punished Courtney instead of trying to mediate the dispute tells all.
I think the biggest problem is ‘Romance Purity’ where to be a Romance it has to be X,Y and Z. Contains magic or magic creatures? not romance. Has aliens? Not Romance. There is no plus in doing so. Just think about it, the greatest romantic lines ever said are in a book not considered Romance:
‘Here Kitty Kitty’
Ashley Apples says
Glad now that I didn’t ever buy that membership. 😐
I had thought they got better after the Courtney Milan fiasco, I’m saddened to learn they didn’t and they got even worse.
Sleepy says
I love Courtney Milan! I remember reading Unveiled by her a while back and it was SO refreshing to have a completely normal, sane love interest who had all reasons for revenge and did enact his revenge– BUT did NOT take the toxic route of taking it out on the heroine and was genuinely a good person! That stepped up and took care of his family! Like the anti toxic masculinity role model that other HR authors desperately needed to look at.
I should go re-read that, I haven’t read HR in such a long time
Marie says
They lost 8,000 members over DEI (among other things). This is why diversity, equity, and inclusion is so important, ESPECIALLY in romance. Everyone deserves a happily ever after.
Karen Dunn says
You two are wonderful, for many reasons. RWA, obviously a racist organization, deserves its humiliating ending. Never will any naysaying re Ilona Andrews come from me.
Karen
MMD says
I credit Courtney Milan and this whole sorry episode for opening my eyes to the problems with the industry. I read traditional romance and paranormal when I could get it. I read what was available without even thinking about it.
There was almost no books by people of colour in the UK shops, we didn’t even have the African American section and Suzanne Brockmann wrote the first gay romance I ever read. I loved Robin and Jules.
I remember thinking how badly and amateurishly the RWA handled the whole thing, banning CM then unbanning her etc.
But I think the industry has changed out of all recognition now and I have been introduced to a raft of wonderful writers that I would have not had access to if it wasn’t for CM calling them out. For this I will always be greatful.